Went to have a bite to eat with the governor and 2000 of his closest friends. Mark Warner has aspirations. Perhaps president. The weather was a sticky 92. The crowd was good ole Virginia Democrats who would be Republicans if we were in New York. But the BBQ was pretty good and its always interesting to see who shows up at the farm. Leslie was with us and Warner chatted with her about the New Orleans mess.

Virginia is a state of contradictions. “Home of the Presidents”, it played a major role in the revolutionary war. It was the capital of the Confederacy. It is geographically at the center of the East Coast. As a state of mind it is stuck in the past, but no more than many European states. Virginia while playing a role in the great war against England had many reasons to not break from the Empire. There were more landed gentry here than perhaps any other state. The tradition of gifting wealth by virtue of position was the tool of the powerful to retain loyalty and encourage growth….the Roman strategy from 2500 years ago.
There is a problem with this method. Much the same way that certain social programs are now faced with the consequences of a good idea in need of re-invention, Virginia lives with a deep inner soul of entitlement of the wealthy. Consider the family that had been gifted 10,000 acres 300 hundred years ago. Why would they support a new government which replaced rule by title with rule by law. They placed all their assets at risk. They would need to fight to hold what they thought was theirs.
This past week a capital murder trail was held in Virginia. The state arrested an attorney for shooting and killing, in broad day light, a neighbor. The motive for the shooting was the concern the shooter had about the farmer he had killed. The farmer, he claimed had threatened him with a 3 foot stick and so he protected himself by killing the farmer with a gun. As it turns out the two individuals knew each other and had been feuding over the consequences of an ancient English law that allowed land owners to access their neighbors for improvements made on their property. The law allowed an owner to build a fence on his property and then send a bill for 50% of the construction to the owner of the adjoining property. The law provided an owner with a legal rule to protect his assets and cause others to absorb the cost. Is this one of the vestiges left over from ole England…..the wealthy trying to protect their property. In this case the result was the death of a man and the excuse was self defense. But if the law had not been on the books and had been removed in 1776, the death may have been avoided.

A well time for another mug of ale.
Virginia is a state of contradictions. “Home of the Presidents”, it played a major role in the revolutionary war. It was the capital of the Confederacy. It is geographically at the center of the East Coast. As a state of mind it is stuck in the past, but no more than many European states. Virginia while playing a role in the great war against England had many reasons to not break from the Empire. There were more landed gentry here than perhaps any other state. The tradition of gifting wealth by virtue of position was the tool of the powerful to retain loyalty and encourage growth….the Roman strategy from 2500 years ago.
There is a problem with this method. Much the same way that certain social programs are now faced with the consequences of a good idea in need of re-invention, Virginia lives with a deep inner soul of entitlement of the wealthy. Consider the family that had been gifted 10,000 acres 300 hundred years ago. Why would they support a new government which replaced rule by title with rule by law. They placed all their assets at risk. They would need to fight to hold what they thought was theirs.
This past week a capital murder trail was held in Virginia. The state arrested an attorney for shooting and killing, in broad day light, a neighbor. The motive for the shooting was the concern the shooter had about the farmer he had killed. The farmer, he claimed had threatened him with a 3 foot stick and so he protected himself by killing the farmer with a gun. As it turns out the two individuals knew each other and had been feuding over the consequences of an ancient English law that allowed land owners to access their neighbors for improvements made on their property. The law allowed an owner to build a fence on his property and then send a bill for 50% of the construction to the owner of the adjoining property. The law provided an owner with a legal rule to protect his assets and cause others to absorb the cost. Is this one of the vestiges left over from ole England…..the wealthy trying to protect their property. In this case the result was the death of a man and the excuse was self defense. But if the law had not been on the books and had been removed in 1776, the death may have been avoided.
A well time for another mug of ale.

